The new Early Years Foundation Stage Profile (EYFSP) was introduced in September 2012. The new Profile made changes to the way children are assessed at the end of the EYFS (the end of academic year in which a child turns five).
A report by the government describes the results of the EYFSP pilot, which took place in the summer term of 2012, and shows that only 41% of the 20,000 children reached the “Good Level of Development” in the prime areas of learning; personal, social and emotional development, physical development, communication and language, and in the specific areas of maths and literacy. This covers 12 of the 17 early learning goals in the revised EYFS.
Megan Pacey, chief executive of Early Education, said it would be at least two years before it would be possible to see if the system worked.
“The statistical data makes for interesting reading, but it is difficult to compare and contrast between the previous EYFS profile and this EYFS profile data because we’re not comparing apples with apples,” she said.
“What we do know is that children will be defined as having reached a Good Level of Development against the EYFS goals and the expectations of some of those goals have changed substantially under the revised EYFS.
“It remains to be seen whether, for example, some of the mathematics early learning goals have been set at an appropriate level and whether the expected levels of development for children of this age are appropriate or not.”
Early years providers will be expected to carry out the first EYFS profiles assessments including the Good Level of Development measure this summer
The report was produced to support the introduction of the new Profile from September, and can be downloaded here.
It’s key findings are sumamrised as:
- 41% of children were assessed as achieving a GLD.
- The total average point score (1) was 32 points.
- Gaps by characteristics for example by gender and free school meals (FSM) were wider in the new GLD than the old GLD (2)
- The widest gaps in the proportion of children achieving the expected level in all of the eight ELGs within the three prime areas of learning was between children whose first language is English and children whose first language is other than English. The gap was 19 percentage points.
- 61% of children achieved the expected level in all of the prime areas of learning.
- Across the 17 early learning goals (ELG), performance ranged from 58% of children achieving (3) the expected level of development to 89% of children achieving the expected level of development. The highest performing ELG was health and self-care and the lowest was numbers.
- All ELGs in the new Profile have statistically significant (4) relationships with each other. This means that if a child performs well in one ELG they are also likely to perform similarly in other ELGs. The strength of each of these relationships is detailed in sections 2.9 and 4.2.
- The difference between the lowest and highest performing LA was greatest in the numbers and shape, space and measures ELGs.
- The difference between performance in the old and new GLD was greatest for children of a Black ethnicity. Performance between the two measures differed by 32 percentage points with performance in the old GLD being higher. This compares to just 22 percentage points for children of a White ethnicity.
Have you read the report? Do you support it’s findings?
1. A child is assigned one point for an emerging ELG, two points for an expected ELG and three points for an exceeding ELG.
2. The proportion of children that achieve six or more points across the seven personal, social and emotional development and communication, language and literacy scales and 78 or more points across all 13 scales.
3. Throughout this paper, ‘achieved’ is defined as either expected or exceeding.
4. Significant at the 95% confidence level or higher.