Men in Early Years: Proven Power to Inspire

Men in Early Years: Proven Power to Inspire

Men in Early Years: From Nursery Floor to Training Room

Men in early years remain rare: walk into most nurseries in England and the chances are every member of staff you meet will be a woman. That's not an impression. According to a House of Commons Library briefing citing 2024 Department for Education data, 97% of staff at school-based providers and childminders are female, rising to 98% at group-based providers such as nurseries.

Put the other way round, men make up somewhere around 2 to 3% of the people caring for and educating this country's youngest children, and that same imbalance follows through into who trains, coaches and leads within the sector too.

Men in Early Years: Harry's Story

Harry Wren has spent his career on both sides of that number. He ran his own nursery before moving into further education and training, and now works as a Development Coach at Parenta, supporting apprentices and practitioners across the sector.

His route in started early: with older siblings, he became an uncle at a young age and often found himself helping out and babysitting. “I realised how much I genuinely enjoyed supporting children and watching them develop,” he says. That early experience eventually led him to open his own nursery, “where I could create an environment that reflects my values and gives children the best possible start in their early years.”

It's Not Just Nappies and Naps, and It's Not Just Curriculum Either

Harry is clear that the biggest misconception about early years work is that it's simply about caring for children, or, from the training side, that it's simple and instinctive enough not to require much thought. “A lot of thought goes into what we do, even during what might look like simple play,” he says.

Practitioners are constantly interacting with children, asking questions, extending their learning and helping them make sense of the world around them. As he puts it, “being an early years educator is about much more than looking after children. It is about helping to lay the foundations for their future.”

That same principle carries straight into how he coaches.

An apprentice trained by someone who's genuinely run a setting, managed a team and made the daily judgement calls brings a different kind of credibility than one working purely from a curriculum document, and Harry uses his own experience on the nursery floor to push apprentices to observe, plan and reflect on their own work rather than just complete tasks.

That skills mismatch matters for recruiting men in early years too. Men already working in sport, youth work, hospitality or health and social care often have a head start without realising it.

If the sector talked about the job in terms of the skills it actually needs, rather than the tasks people assume it involves, it might reach a very different pool of potential recruits, both into nurseries and into training.

What the Research Shows, at Both Ends

The picture is more interesting than the usual assumptions about men in early years suggest, on the child-facing side and the training side alike.

LEYF's own research into men in childcare found that children didn't necessarily gravitate to male staff for football or rough-and-tumble play, the opposite of what most people would assume, though superhero play stood out as one activity nearly every child chose to do specifically with a man. It's a reminder that the value men bring isn't always where you'd expect it.

That's backed by more formal research on the workforce and training side too. GenderEYE, a study funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and carried out with Lancaster University and Norway's Queen Maud University College, looked specifically at what male-inclusive approaches to recruitment and retention actually achieve in early years settings.

Visible role models in training and leadership roles, not just on the nursery floor, are part of what that research points to as making a measurable difference.

A Career, Not a Stopgap

One of the quieter barriers is the assumption that early years is a dead end, or at best a stepping stone to primary teaching. It isn't. There are real routes upward and sideways: from practitioner into management, into SEND specialism, into further education training roles like Harry's own, into youth work, or into support roles across education more broadly.

Harry's own career is the case in point. Running his own nursery showed him just how many opportunities exist in early years beyond working directly with children. “Running my own nursery made me realise just how many opportunities there are for men within the early years sector beyond working directly in a nursery,” he says.

Moving into coaching felt like a natural next step: “I wanted to show that the skills and experience gained in early years can open doors to many different roles, including coaching, mentoring, training and professional development.”

The biggest myth he'd like to bust is that early years has one single career path. “You can progress into leadership and management, coaching, mentoring, training, consultancy and many other areas, using the knowledge and skills you develop along the way.” For men in early years specifically, that progression is often invisible until someone models it, which is exactly what Harry's own move into coaching does.

Harry Wren, one of the few men in early years, coaching an apprentice in a nursery setting

A visible, credible route from practitioner into training and leadership roles gives apprentices something concrete to aim for, and having that route modelled by someone who doesn't fit the sector's usual demographic sends its own message about who this career is actually for.

What the Sector Can Do Next

A few things would move this faster than good intentions alone.

  • Show, don't just tell. Real stories from men in early years, in their own words, do more to shift perception than another statistic ever will, whether that's a man on the nursery floor or a man leading training.
  • Talk about impact honestly. The evidence base is real, on both the child development side and the recruitment and retention side, and it deserves wider circulation than it currently gets.
  • Build bridges, not just job ads. Settings without any male staff could partner with local youth organisations, sports clubs and community groups so children still get exposure to male role models, even while the workforce itself is being rebalanced.
  • Make progression visible from day one. Recruitment and training messaging that shows a 5- or 10-year career path, not just an entry-level job, will land very differently with someone weighing this up.

Harry has never experienced being a man in the sector as a barrier. “Parents, colleagues and the wider community have always been very supportive and welcoming,” he says, and he's noticed that many parents specifically value having a positive male role model in the nursery. His advice to any man weighing up the career, whether that's stepping onto the nursery floor or into a training role, is straightforward: “If you're even thinking about it, give it a try. Give it a chance, get some experience, and see where it takes you. You might be surprised by just how many opportunities the sector can offer.”

None of this fixes itself. But a sector that's aware of its own numbers, honest about what's holding men in early years back, and willing to make the case for this as a serious and skilled career, at every level from the nursery floor to the training room, is a sector that can start to close the gap.

As Harry puts it: “The more men we have working in the sector, the more normalised it will become.”

Keen to explore career pathways like Harry's for your own team, or curious about training routes into early years? Get in touch with our friendly team today, and we'll be happy to help.

How to Build Powerful Parent Communication in Early Years

How to Build Powerful Parent Communication in Early Years

Parent Communication in Early Years: How to Talk to Families with Confidence

For many early years practitioners, the hardest part of the job isn’t the children. It’s the conversation at the door.

Think about the last time you stood at the nursery door as a parent was leaving, and you had something important to say but let the moment pass. Perhaps a child had been unsettled all morning, and you weren't sure how to raise it.

Perhaps you had noticed something that needed mentioning, but pick-up was chaotic, and the opportunity slipped by. That hesitation - the gap between knowing something and saying it - is one of the most common experiences in early years practice, and it costs more than most practitioners realise.

Parent communication in early years shapes what children experience at home, what families trust about your setting, and what practitioners feel equipped to do. It’s not a peripheral skill or a personality trait you either have or don't. It sits at the centre of good practice, and - like every other professional skill - it develops with attention and support.

Why Every Exchange Carries More Weight Than You Think

Parents are a child's first and most enduring educators, and when your observations reach them, children benefit directly. The parent who hears that their child struggled at drop-off can give them extra reassurance that evening.

The practitioner who learns that a family had a difficult night can adjust the day accordingly. Information flowing freely in both directions creates care that wraps around the whole child, not just the hours they spend with you.

Strong parent communication in early years also protects you professionally. Clear, consistent records of what you observed, what you discussed, and what was agreed support safeguarding decisions, SEND referrals, and Ofsted inspections in ways that a vague memory of a doorstep exchange simply cannot.

The relationship works both ways: parents who feel genuinely heard tend to raise concerns early, before they escalate into formal complaints, and to trust that you will address problems openly rather than manage them quietly.

Research consistently shows that parental involvement in early education is one of the strongest predictors of a child's long-term outcomes: when parents see practitioners communicating with warmth and specificity, they start to participate more actively in their child's learning.

That engagement, in turn, shapes what happens at home - and it starts with a practitioner being willing to share what they have seen.

You Have More to Say Than You Realise

Many practitioners underestimate the professional value of what they know; however, you spend more waking hours with some children than their parents do. You notice developmental changes, social patterns, and emotional shifts that families miss entirely - not because they are inattentive parents, but because they are simply not there to see them.

Your observations matter, your concerns are legitimate, and your reassurance means something to the people who have placed the most important thing in their lives in your hands.

The practitioners who communicate most effectively tend to share small, specific details rather than polished summaries. "She tried the zipwire for the first time today and was absolutely beaming" reaches a parent in a way that "she had a great day" never quite does. Specificity is what makes parents feel seen rather than processed - it tells them that someone has been paying real attention to their child, not just supervising a group.

If you find yourself hesitating before sharing a concern, one question cuts through the overthinking faster than any framework: would you want to know this if you were this child's parent? In almost every case, the answer is yes.

When the Conversation Is Hard

Every childcare practitioner will eventually face the conversations nobody wants. A child is struggling to settle, a family's circumstances are affecting their behaviour at the setting, or an accident happened on your watch.

The instinct in these moments is to soften, deflect, or delay - but parents almost always find cushioned or postponed bad news harder to process than a clear, honest account delivered at the right moment. They also lose confidence in practitioners who seem to be working around something.

A simple three-part structure helps. You could start with what you observed: "I've noticed this week that Callum has been very unsettled at drop-off - he's been crying for around 20 minutes each morning, which is longer than usual." Then describe what you've already tried: "We've been pairing him with his key person from the moment he arrives and keeping his favourite book at the door. It's helped a little, but he's still finding the transition difficult."

Finally, invite the parent in: "I wanted to check in with you - has anything changed at home, or have you noticed the same at other times?" This keeps the conversation factual and collaborative, meaning you are sharing what you know and asking for their expertise about their own child, rather than presenting them with a verdict.

Timing matters as much as structure. A difficult conversation started at the door during a busy collection rarely ends well for either party. It’s better to ask a parent to come back at a quieter time, or offer a brief phone call, than to rush something important.

Before a planned review or follow-up meeting, spending five minutes writing down the key facts - what you observed, when, what you have already tried, and what you need to learn from this family - gives you the anchors that keep you steady when the conversation becomes emotional.

Where safeguarding is involved, never manage a conversation alone. Follow your setting's safeguarding policy and speak to your designated safeguarding lead before and after any discussion that touches on welfare concerns.

The Small Habits That Build Trust Before You Need It

Confidence in parent communication grows through repetition, and the practitioners who find it easiest tend to communicate little and often rather than saving everything up for a weekly update. Greeting every parent by name signals that they are a person to you, not a handover slot.

Sharing one specific observation at each collection - something you genuinely saw, not a polished summary - builds the habit of noticing and narrating. When a face-to-face conversation isn't possible, a brief note in the child's learning journal or a message through your nursery management software preserves the moment rather than losing it.

It’s also worth asking parents, early in the relationship and again at review points, what they actually want from you. Some families want daily detail and feel reassured by frequent contact; others find that volume overwhelming and prefer a broader weekly picture.

Asking the question is itself an act of communication - it tells families that their preferences matter to you. And some of the most trust-building conversations are the unexpected positive ones: a message home about a breakthrough, a note about something funny a child said, a moment shared purely because the parent would want to know. These small investments are the ones that make difficult conversations considerably easier when they eventually come.

When Parents Disagree

Not every conversation will go smoothly. Parents sometimes challenge your observations, question your judgement, or become emotional in ways that feel hard to manage from the other side of the door.

The thing worth holding onto in those moments is that a parent who pushes back is almost always a parent who cares deeply about their child. That energy - even when it presents as confrontation - is far easier to work with than disengagement.

When a parent disagrees with you, your role isn’t to win the argument but to understand their concern. "Help me understand where you're coming from" is one of the most useful phrases in a practitioner's toolkit - it slows the conversation down and shifts it from confrontation into dialogue.

You can hold your professional position while acknowledging their view without surrendering it: "I can see why that's worrying for you, and I want to make sure we're working on this together" is something very different from simply dropping your concern. If a conversation becomes heated, pausing it’s a professional response, not an avoidance tactic. "I want to give this the attention it deserves - can we find a time to sit down properly?" keeps the relationship intact and the issue on the table. Document every significant conversation: the date, what was discussed, and what was agreed.

For further guidance on managing challenging parent conversations, the Early Years Alliance offers practical resources and support for practitioners across England.

Building a Team That Communicates Well

Confidence in parent communication in early years doesn’t arrive fully formed with experience. It develops through practice, peer support, and the kind of professional training that gives practitioners language for conversations that might otherwise feel out of reach. Courses covering attachment theory, EYFS, communication skills, and SEND are not just professional development boxes to tick - they change what you feel able to say, and to whom, when it matters.

Peer observation is one of the most underused tools in early years settings. Watching how a more experienced colleague handles drop-off conversations for a week, then debriefing together afterwards, surfaces habits and phrases that have been built up over years but rarely consciously articulated. It costs nothing and develops skill faster than almost any other method available.

For managers and room leaders, it’s worth examining the conditions before examining individual performance. Do your practitioners have any protected time for parent conversations? Are they supported after a difficult exchange, or left to absorb it alone?

Settings that invest in communication training - and that create a culture where difficult conversations are discussed rather than buried - improve faster than those that leave practitioners to develop the skill in isolation. When senior staff model open, specific, and confident communication with families at the door, in meetings, and in written updates, the whole team takes its lead from that.

Parenta's childcare training programmes cover child development, EYFS, communication skills, and SEND - designed for practitioners at every level, from apprentices to room leaders. If you would like to find out how we can support your team, get in touch today. We would love to help.

Join the conversation: what's the hardest parent conversation you've had to navigate, and how did you approach it? Share your tips in the comments below - we would love to hear from you.

Menopause and Retention: Why Support Matters Now

Menopause and Retention: Why Support Matters Now

The Quiet Struggle: Supporting Staff Through Menopause in Your Setting

With 97% of the early years workforce being female, menopause is already present in most childcare teams. Most employers just don't know it yet.

One of your most experienced practitioners has been with your setting for eight years. She knows every child, every parent, every difficult pick-up and tricky morning routine. Lately, though, she’s been struggling: exhausted despite sleeping, too warm when everyone else finds the room comfortable, losing confidence in herself in ways she can’t quite name.

She hasn’t mentioned it to anyone, because she doesn’t know if she can. That is menopause. And in most childcare settings, it’s playing out right now, in silence.

Around 6 million people in the UK workforce are currently experiencing menopause, and the early years sector is 97% female, so several people in your team are almost certainly among them. Yet 70% of those going through menopause say their employer offers no meaningful support.

For a sector already stretched by recruitment and retention pressures, supporting staff through menopause is not a nice-to-have. It’s part of keeping your team together.

Why Childcare Makes This Harder

Menopause affects people differently, but the nature of early years work makes its symptoms harder to manage than in many other professions. Your practitioners spend the full day on their feet, in warm rooms, lifting children, navigating noise, and holding emotional space for the families in your care.

A hot flush in a busy baby room is not a minor inconvenience, and brain fog, when you are responsible for the welfare of young children, can shake a practitioner’s confidence in ways that linger long after the symptom passes.

3 in 4 people going through menopause experience symptoms. For 1 in 4, those symptoms are severe: hot flushes, fatigue, anxiety, and disrupted sleep, night after night.

UK businesses lose an estimated £191 million a year to menopause-related absenteeism and presenteeism, and around 10% of employees leave their jobs altogether when symptoms go unmanaged. In early years, where losing one experienced practitioner costs weeks of recruitment and months of onboarding, that loss goes deeper than any figure captures.

It’s the trust built slowly between a key worker and a child. It’s the institutional knowledge that leaves with them.

What the Law Now Requires

Menopause isn’t a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010, but that doesn’t mean employers face no legal exposure. Where symptoms are severe and persistent enough to affect a person’s ability to do their job, they may qualify as a disability - and at that point, making reasonable adjustments becomes a legal duty, not a choice employers can opt out of.

Employment tribunal claims citing menopause tripled in recent years, with payouts frequently exceeding £60,000. The Employment Rights Act, which received Royal Assent in December 2025, adds further pressure: employers with 250 or more staff must produce Equality Action Plans that explicitly address menopause support, with the requirement becoming mandatory from spring 2027.

Smaller settings are exempt from that reporting obligation, but the underlying legal duties apply to every employer, whatever the headcount.

What Good Support Actually Looks Like

Childcare practitioners having an open conversation about menopause support at work

 

You don’t need a large HR function or a complex policy to make a real difference - the most effective changes tend to be simple ones, done consistently - and the first is making it safe to talk.

Many women wait months before telling anyone at work about their menopause, worried their manager will see them differently or assume they are winding down their career. Managers don’t need to become experts in the topic; they just need to be approachable.

A line as simple as “I want you to know we’re supportive if you’re going through any health changes” opens the door. Most practitioners aren’t looking for a formal process - they're looking for permission to have the conversation.

From there, flexible working is one of the most practical tools available. Since April 2024, all employees have had the right to request it from day one of employment. For someone managing night sweats and broken sleep, an adjusted start time or a shift swap can make a measurable difference to how they function across the day.

Childcare ratios and rotas limit how much flexibility is possible, of course - that’s a genuine constraint - but where adjusted hours are offered, and where requests are handled with care rather than dismissed, staff take notice. It tells them something important about where they work.

Environmental adjustments often cost almost nothing: a desk fan, access to a cooler room for a short break, a uniform policy that allows breathable fabrics, and separate recording of menopause-related absence so that practitioners don’t unfairly reach disciplinary trigger points during a difficult few months.

All of these are practical tools for supporting staff through menopause in the day-to-day reality of an early years setting. The Equality and Human Rights Commission publishes clear, free guidance on workplace adjustments - worth having to hand when you sit down with an individual team member to agree a plan.

Finally, a written policy changes the conversation before it even starts: only 24% of UK employers have a stated menopause policy. A single plain-English page - stating your commitment, naming available adjustments, and telling people who to speak to in confidence - signals that this is a setting where staff can ask for help.

The UK government’s guidance on workplace adjustments for menopause at gov.uk is a practical starting point.

October Is a Good Moment to Start

World Menopause Month runs throughout October, with World Menopause Day falling on the 18th. It’s worth remembering, though, that you don’t need to overhaul your HR approach overnight.

Try committing to one thing: a team conversation, a policy review, or a change to how you record menopause-related absence. Each step builds a workplace where your most experienced practitioners feel able to stay.

Building a culture where people can talk openly about their health is part of building a setting where staff choose to work for the long term. Supporting staff through menopause is also an investment in the quality of care your setting delivers.

When your team feel supported, they stay longer, take fewer unplanned days off, and bring more to the workplace.

The practitioner who has been with you for eight years, who knows every child by name - she deserves that from you. And your setting needs her.

If you’d like to explore how our childcare training programmes can support your team’s development and well-being this Menopause Awareness Month, get in touch with our friendly team today. We’d love to help.

Join the conversation: does your setting have a menopause policy yet? Let us know in the comments what's worked well, or what support you wish you had.

Gatsby Benchmarks in Early Years – A Practical Guide

Gatsby Benchmarks in Early Years – A Practical Guide

Gatsby Benchmarks: what they are and why they matter in early years

Gatsby Benchmarks might sound like secondary-school territory, but they hold real value for early years settings too, offering a clear framework for broadening children's horizons and supporting staff development.

When we think of careers guidance, we often imagine older students choosing GCSEs, A-levels or initial workplaces. But the principles behind the Gatsby Benchmarks, developed to shape high-quality careers provision, are relevant to all phases of education, including early years.

While young children are not making vocational choices, introducing children to a wide and diverse world of careers, and helping your staff reflect on their own professional development, can both benefit from the clarity that the Gatsby Benchmarks offer.

What are the Gatsby Benchmarks?

The Gatsby Benchmarks were created by the Gatsby Foundation, based on a major international study led by Sir John Holman, former headteacher and founder of the National STEM Learning Centre. The goal was to identify what actually works in career guidance systems worldwide.

First published in 2014, they were later adopted into UK government statutory guidance for schools and colleges from 2018 onward and have recently been updated in 2024.  At their heart, the Gatsby Benchmarks are a framework to ensure that careers education and careers-related opportunities are purposeful, inclusive and progressive.

Are they relevant to early years?

Although originally developed for secondary schools, they provide a useful lens through which to review how children are exposed to a diverse range of people, experiences and work roles in early years settings. They can also be used to promote open-minded attitudes about work, skills and learning.

The Gatsby Benchmarks describe eight key elements of excellent careers provision:

  1. A stable careers programme
  2. Learning from labour market information
  3. Addressing needs of each learner
  4. Linking curriculum learning to careers
  5. Encounters with employers and employees
  6. Experiences of workplaces
  7. Encounters with further and higher education
  8. Personal guidance

In early years, we can adapt the spirit of these principles rather than expecting children to plan careers or navigate labour market data. On this level, the intention is to broaden horizons, challenge stereotypes and embed curiosity about different roles.

Introducing careers early: children’s experiences

Young children are naturally curious about who people are and what they do. Early years practitioners can use this curiosity constructively to build attitudes that will benefit children throughout their lives.

Being exposed to unusual careers, role models and diverse working situations will help broaden the minds and ideas of our youngest generation.

Here are practical ways to address early versions of the Gatsby Benchmarks in your setting:

  • Encounters with employers and employees: Invite visitors from a range of professions to share what they do and why they enjoy it, whether that is a vet, firefighter, architect or software games designer. Even brief encounters broaden children’s knowledge
  • Challenging stereotypes: Be intentional in the roles you highlight. Show children images and stories of men and women in a wide variety of jobs, for example a male early years educator, a female mechanic or a non-binary scientist. This early exposure helps counter rigid stereotypes and builds inclusivity
  • Linking learning to real life: Use role play, stories and play scenarios that reflect different jobs. A ‘builder’s site’ in the construction area today might link to problem-solving and measure concepts; a role play in a post office or shop can help children practice communication skills; and a recycling area can link to work around protecting our environment
  • Learning from adults’ roles: Explain what people do in simple, accessible ways that help children see their value. This might include explaining how planning learning helps children grow or how cleaning up helps everyone stay safe and why we need both

While children are not developing explicit career plans, these experiences show that all people can contribute to society in different ways.

Here are some quick actions you could take to embed some of these ideas:

  • Create a board of “People Who Help Us” that includes local and global professions with inclusive images and child-friendly job descriptions
  • Share short profiles of your own team’s roles and routes into early years with parents and children
  • Plan a reflective staff session on staff aspirations and professional pathways using a simplified Gatsby review tool
  • Organise one visit or interaction per term where children meet someone from a profession they haven’t met before
  • Link nursery themes such as ‘houses and homes’, ‘transport’ or ‘staying safe’ to people who work in your community

Using the Benchmarks to support staff development

The Gatsby Benchmarks are incredibly valuable when applied in a structured way to the professional journeys of your staff.

Here are some ways to use the benchmarks as a reflective tool:

  • Benchmark 1 - Stable careers programme: Think about how your setting supports your practitioners’ development over time. Do you have plans for inductions, mentoring and progression conversations?
  • Benchmark 2 & 3 - Labour market information and individual needs: Encourage staff to engage with emerging research, sector pay scales and role developments so that they can make informed decisions about their own progression. Consider one-to-one reviews where staff can discuss their goals and how tailored CPD pathways can benefit the practitioner and the setting
  • Benchmark 4 - Linking learning to careers: Reflect on how everyday practice links to potential next career steps. For example, a Level 3 practitioner might support a Level 2 colleague to deepen their understanding of planning. A leader may encourage CPD routes to support a practitioner’s career goals
  • Benchmark 5 & 6 - Encounters with employers and workplaces: Arrange opportunities for practitioners to observe or partner with other settings, share practice and learn from peers. Professional networks and collaborative learning promote fresh ideas and career confidence. You can also offer work experience placements to local schools and colleges
  • Benchmark 7 - Further and higher education: Make time for staff to explore progression routes such as child development degrees, specialisms or leadership qualifications. Ensure your setting actively supports study leave or funded development where possible and be open to work placements from degree-level students
  • Benchmark 8 - Personal guidance: Provide access to high-quality mentoring, coaching or supervisory conversations where staff can discuss their own aspirations and reflect on how they can develop within your organisation

Using the benchmarks in this way doesn’t require you to replicate a secondary careers provision; it simply promotes a better understanding of how your setting supports lifelong learning and aspirations among its own team.

As the sector continues to professionalise, aligning with frameworks like the Gatsby Benchmarks helps the early years align with wider educational and career narratives. It shows that every learner and every practitioner is entitled to thoughtful support, exploration and progression.

Early years practitioner talking to children about different careers as part of the Gatsby Benchmarks in early years

Bringing the Gatsby Benchmarks to Life in Your Setting

Embedding the Gatsby Benchmarks doesn’t need to be complicated, but it does benefit from a team that feels confident talking about careers, roles and professional pathways.

Our childcare training programmes support practitioners at every level, from apprentices to room leaders, with structured development that mirrors the spirit of the Benchmarks. If you would like to explore how we can support your team’s progression, get in touch today. We would love to help.

Join the conversation: which Gatsby Benchmark do you think your setting could embed more easily this term? Tell us in the comments below - we would love to hear your ideas.

You can find more articles like this on the Parenta blog.

References

Gatsby Benchmarks Explained

The Truth About Autistic Children and “Rude” Behaviour

The Truth About Autistic Children and “Rude” Behaviour

Misread as Rude: Why Autistic Children Need Compassion, Not Correction

Supporting autistic children well starts with understanding their communication on its own terms, rather than correcting it to match a script that was never designed with them in mind.

In each of this series of 12 articles, Dr Jo Grace shares an autistic trait with us, showing how early research pathologised difference as a problem and then giving us insight into more contemporary work in which difference is viewed as neutral, and problems are solved through understanding and collaboration.

Magic word illustration from My Mummy is Autistic by Heath Grace

Illustration of a father reminding his child to say please, showing a neurodiverse family supporting autistic children with different communication styles

Illustration of Daddy reminding me to say please, from My Daddy is Not Autistic, by Elias Grace

 

Understanding Autism Through a Child’s Perspective

In 2020 I became the UK’s most obnoxiously proud mummy when my son became the UK’s youngest published author with his book: My Mummy is Autistic. He wrote it as he turned five, illustrating it with the vibrant felt-tip pen drawings that only children are capable of.

Along with everything else that happened that year, I had a baby…that baby has just turned five and his book: My Daddy is Not Autistic came out in March 2026. It is not mandatory for sons of mine to write books by their fifth birthdays, but circumstances conspired and we find ourselves in this situation!

This is the tenth article in a series of twelve interconnected articles that all explore autistic experience through the eyes of a child. Both of my boys note in their own way in their books that “Mummy is not great at saying please”.

It is unsurprising really when you consider they both wrote their books at an age where expectations that you say please are really hotting up. My not saying please, or forgetting to say please, can easily be read as rude. But is it so simple?

In the olden days of autism research, researchers identified differences between autistic and nonautistic people and then described these differences as problems related to being autistic. The person on one side of the difference was right, the other wrong.

Contemporary research is less quick to judge; after all, we now operate in a society that is better at understanding that people can be different without one being right and one being wrong and we are taught to respect diversity more so than we were before. Researchers such as Baron-Cohen (1995) cited differences in using words like “please” and “thank you” as a lack of empathy or social awareness.

Autistic people often use direct communication; not scripted politeness - but doing these things does not mean you do not care about others.

Why Autistic Honesty Can Be Misinterpreted

My son and I encountered the phenomenon of the directness of autistic communication appearing careless or rude when he first asked to write his book. We communicate across a neurodivide (the translation effort involved in this was something discussed in last month’s article).

He had been bringing home ‘books’ from Grandma’s house that he had made himself. Pieces of A4 paper folded in half and stappled together by Grandma, upon which he had drawn pictures and scribbled text. I would “read” these books, with help from him, and they’d be displayed on the fridge before being placed in their final resting place: the recycling bin.

One day he asked me: “Mummy, when is my book going to be on the shelf like my brother’s?”

“Your book is not going on the shelf”, I told him, “It’s going in the recycling bin”.

I spoke the truth, but he was hurt by the sudden realisation that he was not, as he had thought, following in his big brother’s footsteps and publishing a book. (It was this conversation that his book: My Daddy is Not Autistic, sprang from, and also this conversation in which I realised the effect of growing up in a household where your older brother is the UKs youngest published author!)

Contemporary researchers, for example, Williams et al (2021) reflect this experience in their work, observing that autistic people’s communication often reflects different pragmatic norms and is not indicative of rudeness. They recognise breakdown in communication to be intersubjective (between people), not the responsibility of one party over the other.

So, was I being mean to my son when I answered so bluntly? Or was I simply being honest? Does my not saying please automatically indicate a lack of social care for the person to whom I am making my request?

Likewise, does my lack of a “thank you” indicate a lack of gratitude? Or is it possible that I both care about the people I make requests from and am grateful, despite not performing gratitude verbally?

Why Politeness Words Don’t Always Reflect True Feelings

Words like “please” and “thank you” are social signals; they are not the ‘thing’ itself. A person might not feel grateful at all and yet still say “thank you”, misusing the signal. And a person might feel very grateful indeed but not remember to say thank you.

Mistaking the signal for the meaning is a common mistake of language users.

Cultural Differences in Communication Styles and Autism

These social scripts are cultural creations, not moral truths. I have often been in conversation with autistic friends who have had experience of the cultural landscape of other countries. I lived in Germany for two years and sometimes joke that I was less autistic when I was out there.

Of course, I was as autistic as I am now, but I met fewer communication barriers because, socially, German people tend to be more direct in their communication than English people - who are famously obtuse in their communication style - and because I was communicating across a language barrier, people never assumed I understood and always took care to check that their communication had landed.

When we respect different communication styles, and do not automatically pathologise or demonise one side of a communication breakdown, we can ALL communicate more effectively.

Teaching Children to Respect Different Communication Styles

You can continue to try to teach the autistic child to say “please” and “thank you”, in accordance with the social landscape - as my children continue to remind me to do the same, but as you do this, try to also teach the nonautistic child that some people communicate in direct and factual ways and do so to be clear in their communication, not to hurt or offend.

In this way, you bridge the communication divide from both sides.

Supporting Autistic Children in Your Setting

The NHS offers accessible guidance on recognising and supporting autism, which sits alongside the kind of relational, compassionate approach explored above. Our childcare training programmes cover SEND and inclusive practice for practitioners at every level.

If you would like to find out how we can support your team, get in touch today. We would love to help.

Join the conversation: have you noticed a child in your care communicate directly, in a way that could easily be misread as rude? How did you respond, and what helped? Share your experiences in the comments below.

You can read the rest of Dr Jo Grace's series on the Parenta blog.

References

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. MIT Press
  • Grace, E and Grace, J (2026) My Daddy is Not Autistic. Routledge
  • Grace, H and Grace, J. (2020) My Mummy is Autistic. Routledge
  • Williams, G. L., Wharton, T., and Jagoe, C. (2021) Mutual (mis)understanding: Reframing autistic pragmatic “impairments@ using relevance theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.

 

Autism

Discover more: About Dr Joanna Grace

Other articles:
Facial Expressions & Autism: The Truth
Understanding an Autistic Child: 3 Secrets to Double Empathy
Being Autistic – what my children taught me
Language processing differences
Exploring language
How to Support Autism Communication with Complete Clarity

Expression of interest

Complete the form below if you are interested in joining our family. 

You have Successfully Subscribed!